LOGICAL ILLOGICAL??

LOGICAL , ILLOGICAL

= LOGICAILAIL

if everything is illogical, there will be a hesitant to be logical, self consciousness

how ironic is that we create instructions for how we should live, no

we create instructions for how others could aid ourselves to live, selfishly (to put it that way)

we are being placed in a position to be logical only to live

the society's standard demanded logical practitioners 

school was build, then instructions was created within the system,

school became a place for //and to generate logical thinkers as to meet the demands of the society 

art schools conduct logical* classes

now creation make not much sense, since there is a need to be logical even in creation

we have to force ourselves to meet standards and act logically

art was never from within, art was instructed now

and it shaped many of our thinking process towards art making

because we are always accepting things naturally, the body gives in

many portrays these emotions of pain in physical reality 

knowing the  body is a natural element, the body don't hide

although the brain can hide it's images of 

thoughts and the disrupted inside a imaginative storage

what is natural will always flow towards the surface

the dislikes, the disdained faces, the stressed, the depressed are seen 

but still i have to say many act accordingly, logically, not because they like

because they loose the control and awareness of their actuality for reality, to live

logical steps is a guide for the new practitioners - beginners

logical steps are found in instruction books

logical steps are pre-created notion in modern/contemporary living life

logical steps are only for life's neccessity in the way our body works, eg. eating

logical steps in art making can never happen unless reproduction

other than that almost everything is illogical 

in art making, creative process research and development is important

but is there a need for being logical in every steps in the creating process

and always remained objective about it?

i've been questioned on my development in art making 

that the amount of research determines what sort of work you might make which is true

but talking about coming to write and analyze a religion,

we can think about building a library of books base on our research on that

the natural response towards a subject in art making is the most sincere and genuine

and it's not by the lack of knowledge or respect of anything

by inputting our natural response into a work of art, 

we are creating it slowly base on how we felt and live by all the time

and not by the writings of other people

and the build up perceptions, remarks mentioned by none other than you

questioning on being logical 

you can ask how did the water manage to pass through the cracks?

water is contained (whole) and also a formidable force,

yet it evaporates and separates as it vanishes easily 

it brings life, destroy life and dissolve life

so how did it pass through the cracks? it just did

that's probably art making, 

yes we do question, research and think logically*

but in the end we just kind of did it, it just happen

the water just pass through the crack

questioning deeper

how does using the idea of water to relate to the making of art?

how logical is it for the water to pass through the crack, 

not knowing how was the cracked initially formed?

is there a logical procedure for water passing through the cracks?

is there a need for the water to understand before it flows through?

no. it simply takes the shape and flow through it

in creation, we take the shape of the situation, contain it and flow with it

flow is the most powerful, effortless and natural element* that is already within us

so i was wondering how logical for is it for me to work on a project theme based on -religion/brands

i wasn't there and aware when religion/brands started

the water wasn't there when the cracked happened

it's actually caused by a build up erosion, unknowingly

-just as religions/brands, 

only to know by reading both visually and contextually- base on text and pictorials, 

does it bring enough justice to convince me personally to act logically and accordingly

no.

constantly we simply pick what provokes, what interacts well, what looks beautiful

what convinces us. -

-which tells us something about ourselves actually,  unconsciously

-we picked ourselves

so tell me if there's a need to understand what beauty is?

what really caused the provoking issues, 

how did it end up convincing someone who wasn't there, you

it's natural, it flows, it gets into you just like that, without any logical steps

there are no objectives for the water, it keeps flowing, even between the cracks and after

in art making, we know we will have to pass through a certain medium 

and eventually gets on to the other side

being objective about your work and steps in making everything logical, a have to?

there's a no need for a wasted thinking time to even bother if you will get on the other side

to know if its logically good enough or completed, all i can say is just do it, 

everything will flow through, be great, be you in what you make, naturally

art-making and processes/////

to my knowledge of things no matter how much research is done, 

the action (doing, craftsmanship, skills) is always the other half

too much thinking brings you nowhere

the visual is the utmost important in a visual culture

but all the more artists are pushing boundaries to enriched all other sensory we have

other than sight

why logical?  how is any thing ever logical?

it was all based on research past research

to think about it? are there even any logical steps in researching so? 

logical in the way it was chronically written

research can be relevant and irrelevant but it means nothing of determining an answer to your goal 

there are no logical steps when you are experimenting with researched results only hypothesis

so does hypothesis leads you to think logically and chronically? 

no. in fact no one is ever sure of the result till its tested

it's the same for art..especially working with various mediums and concepts  

putting it in a way - 

how could we possibly judge and conclude what others expects of the final results

how could we be objective and certain to expect the outcome of a project, unless it's a redo

like again, redo can turn things out completely differently

convince me about a logical accident, without mentioning a scripted play

we are not made to follow instructions and be logical like how machines are

is creation logical? 

create x awake,

orsqr